64 attitudes, intentions and behaviors differed depending on the target behavior. The LCT-based information about refill products had significant effects on changes in attitudes and intentions, but not on follow-up practices. However, LCT-based information about waste separation had a significant effect on attitude change, particularly in respondents with a low baseline attitude level, but had no significant effect on intention and follow-up practices. The results indicate that information based on LCT can improve people’s attitudes toward target behaviors, but additional support is needed to facilitate behavioral change. theoretical analysis and Psychological Bulletin, 84 (5): 888. behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2): 179–211. (in) effectiveness of the This study was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-16-1(1), JPMEERF16S11601) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan. review of empirical research S. PHUPHISITH et al. Lee, H., Kurisu, K. and Hanaki, K. (2015) The effect of information provision on pro-environmental behaviors. Low Carbon Economy, 6: 30–40. Lewandowska, A., Witczak, J., Giungato, P., Dierks, C., Kurczewski, P. and Pawlak-Lemanska, K. (2018) Inclusion of life cycle thinking in a sustainability-oriented consumer’s typology: A proposed methodology and an assessment tool. Sustainability, 10 (6): 1826. Mungkung, R., Sorakon, K., Sitthikitpanya, S. and Gheewala, S. H. (2021) Analysis of green product procurement and ecolabels towards sustainable consumption and production in Thailand. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28: 11–20. Olander, F. and Thogersen, J. (1995) Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18 (4): 345–385. Phuphisith, S., Kurisu, K. and Hanaki, K. (2017) Insight into pro- environmental behaviors and people’s perceptions in Bangkok, Thailand. Journal of Environmental Information Science, 45: 9–20. Schultz, P.W. (1999) Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21 (1): 25–36. Schultz, P.W. (2002) Knowledge, information, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In: T. Dietz and P. C. Stern (eds.), New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures, 67–82. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/10401 Shimpo, Y., Nakatani, J., Kurisu, K. and Hanaki, K. (2012) Life-cycle assessment of household waste prevention behaviors. Environmental Science, Japan, 25 (2): 95–105. (in Japanese) Tsuda, K., Hara, K. and Uwasu, M. (2013) Prospects and challenges for disseminating life cycle thinking towards environmental conscious behaviors in daily lives. Sustainability, 5 (1): 123–135. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2012) Greening the Economy through Life Cycle Thinking – Ten Years of the from: UNEP/SETAC https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/2012_LCI_10_years_28.3.13.pdf (accessed 16 May 2021) Upham, P., Dendler, L. and Bleda, M. (2011) Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19 (4): 348–355. education, quality of life, and low-carbon society development. Sarunnoud PHUPHISITH Sarunnoud Phuphisith is a lecturer in the Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University. She received her D.Eng. in Urban Engineering from the University of Tokyo in include 2017. Her promotion through pro-environmental behaviors and people’s perceptions, life-cycle impact, and sustainability assessment. Kiyo KURISU Kiyo Kurisu is an associate professor in the Department of Urban Engineering, School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo. She received her D.Eng. from the University of Tokyo in 2000. Her research interests include behaviors, LCT-based pro-environmental Keisuke HANAKI Keisuke Hanaki is a Professor at the School of Information Networking for Innovation and Design, Toyo University. His research fields include holistic environmental management in urban area for sustainability, greenhouse gas emission reduction of from urban activities and creation of a material-circular-oriented society with high quality of life. Initiative. Retrieved Life Cycle research environmentally-friendly of (Received 7 June 2021, Accepted 17 August 2021) interests lifestyles Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Asian Development Bank (2015) Southeast Asia and the Economics of Global Climate Stabilization. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City, Philippines. Retrieved from https://www. adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/178615/sea-economics-global-climate-stabilization.pdf (accessed 16 May 2021) Bolderdijk, J. W., Gorsira, M., Keizer, K. and Steg, L. (2013) Values determine informational interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior. PloS One, 8 (12): e83911. Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R. and Kallgren, C.A. (1990) A Focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58: 1015–1026. De Young, R. (1990) Recycling as appropriate behavior: a review of survey data from selected recycling education programs in Michigan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3: 253–266. Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E. and Richler, J.J. (2012) Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141 (1): 2–18. Gheewala, S.H. and Mungcharoen, T. (2017) Perspectives on life cycle assessment application and in Thailand. Indonesian Journal of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability, 1 (1): 8–12. Guagnano, G.A., Stern, P.C. and Dietz, T. (1995) Influences on attitude-behavior relationships a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27 (5): 699–718. Iyer, E.S. and Kashyap, R.K. (2007) Consumer recycling: role of incentives, information, and social class. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6: 32–47. Kaiser, F.G. and Fuhrer, U. (2003) Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology, 52 (4): 598–613. Kikuchi-Uehara, E., Nakatani, J. and Hirao, M. (2016 a) Analysis of factors influencing consumers’ proenvironmental behavior based on life cycle thinking. Part I: effect of environmental awareness and trust in environmental information on product choice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117: 10–18. Kikuchi-Uehara, E., Nakatani, J. and Hirao, M. (2016 b) Analysis of factors influencing consumers’ proenvironmental behavior based on life cycle thinking. Part II: trust model of environmental information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125: 216–226. Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8 (3): 239–260. Lee, H., Kurisu, K. and Hanaki, K. (2013) Influential factors on pro-environmental behaviors – A case study in Tokyo and Seoul. Low Carbon Economy, 4: 104. Acknowledgement References Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1977) Attitude-behavior relations: A research.
元のページ ../index.html#70